Most helpful client reviews
29517 of 29857 humans found the following review helpful.
Kindle vs. Nook (updated 6/2/2011)
By Ron Cronovich
When I wrote this review in August 2010, there was only one Nook, which is now called “Nook First Edition.” It proceeds to be available, but there are two new Nooks. The Nook Color was introduced last fall – it’s fundamentally a tablet computer, and runs the Android software that is ordinary on numerous smartphones nowadays. It’s twice as heavy and costs twice as much as a Kindle, but equated to other tablet computers, it is a very good value.
And now (early June 2011), a new e-ink based Nook is coming out. It’s called the “Nook Simple Touch.” It is just now starting to ship, so evidently I don’t have one and can’t tell you anything in regards to it that you can’t learn by reading online reviews. But the reviews are very favorable, so if you’re giving careful consideration to a Kindle, you will have to take a look at the new Nook Simple Touch, too.
But the Kindle is nonetheless still a compelling option. It’s a mature product, very well designed and easy to use, performance is very zippy, it’s competitively priced, and no e-ink based reader has a better, more readable display than the Kindle, not even the new Nook Simple Touch. Also, the Kindle universe is rather extensive: the Kindle store is great and has numerous thousands of free e-books as well as good deals on most other e-books, and once purchased, you may read your Kindle books on almost any device you own (computer, phone, tablet), not just your Kindle. And there are tons of great cases and other accessaries for the Kindle.
So, while my review compares the Kindle to the older Nook, I’ll leave it here because it has a ton of selective information regarding the Kindle, a outstanding e-reader that deserves your attention, and because the basi Nook proceeds to be available. That said, I urge you to NOT buy the primary Nook. It was a respectable e-reader when it came out in 2009, and still had a lot of value when I wrote when it comes to it in August 2010, but it is without doubt or question inferior by today’s standards.
———— my firstborn review ————–
If you’re attempting to choose amid a Nook and a Kindle, perhaps I may help. My wife and I have owned a Nook (the firstborn one), a Kindle 2, and a Kindle DX. When Amazon declared the Kindle 3 this summer, we pre-ordered two Kindle 3′s: the wi-fi only model in graphite, and the wi-fi + 3G model in white. They arrived in late August and we have applied them very regularly since then. For us, Kindle is better than Nook, but Nook is a good device with it is own vantages that I will talk about below. I’ll end this review with a few words when it comes to the Nook Color.
First, reasons why we prefer the Kindle:
* Speed
In our experience, the Kindle is very zippy equated to the Nook. Page refresh speed (the time it takes a new page to appear after you push the page-turn button) was WAY quicker on Kindle 2 than on Nook, and it’s rapidly and without delay yet on Kindle 3. Yet, I read a whole book on the Nook and didn’t find the slower page refresh to be annoying – you get employed to it, and it’s not a problem.
For me, the more necessary speed divergence worries navigation – moving the cursor around the screen, for example to pick a book from your library, or to jump to a chapter by selecting it in the table of contents. On Kindle, you do this by pushing a 5-way rocker button, and the cursor moves very quickly. On Nook, you do this by activating the color LCD touchscreen (which normally shuts off when not in use, to conserve battery). A “virtual rocker button” appears on the screen, and you touch it to move the cursor. Unfortunately, the Nook cursor moves very sluggishly. This might not be a huge deal to you, but it actually got annoying to me, peculiarly since my wife’s Kindle was so quick and responsive.
In November 2010, Nook got a software upgrade that increments page refresh speed and makes navigation more responsive. I returned my Nook months ago, so I can not tell you if the Nook’s performance is now equivalent to the Kindle’s, but Nook owners in the remarks section have convinced me that the software update improves the experience of using the Nook. If performance is a big element in your decision, visit a Best Buy and compare Kindle and Nook side by side.
* Screen contrast
You’ve seen Amazon’s claims that the Kindle 3 e-ink has 50% better contrast than Kindle 2 or other e-ink devices. I have no way of precisely measuring the betterment in contrast, but I may tell you that the Kindle 3 display unquestionably has more contrast than Kindle 2 or Nook. The divergence is noticeable, and important: more screen contrast means less eyestrain when reading in poorly lit rooms.
In well-lit rooms, the Nook and Kindle 2 have sufficient contrast to concede for comfortable reading. But I often read in low-light conditions, like in bed at night, or in a poorly lit room. In these situations, reading on Nook or Kindle 2 was a bit uncomfortable and often times gave me a mild headache. When I got the Kindle 3, the extra contrast was without delay noticeable, and made it more comfortable to read beneath less-than-ideal lighting conditions. (If you go with a Nook, just make sure you have a good reading lamp nearby.)
* Battery life
The Nook’s color LCD touch screen drains it is battery speedily – I could never get more than 5 days out of a charge. The Kindle 2 had longer battery life than the Nook, and Kindle 3 has even longer life: in the 3 months since we received our Kindle 3′s, we distinctively get 3 weeks of battery life amongst charges. (We keep wireless off when it comes to half the time to save battery power.)
* Weight
Nook weighs in regards to 3 ounces more than the new Kindle, and you may actually feel the difference. Without a case, Nook is still light sufficient to hold in one hand for long reading sessions without fatigue. But in a case, Nook is a heavy sucker. The new Kindle 3 is so light, even in a case, we find it comfortable keeping in one hand for long reading sessions.
Reasons galore people might prefer the Nook:
* In-store experience
If you need aid with your nook, you may take it to any barnes and noble and get a real humane to help. You may take your nook into the coffee shop section of your local B&N store and read any book for free for up to one hour per day. When you take your nook to B&N, galore in-store particular deals and the occasional free book pop up on your screen.
* User-replaceable battery
Rechargeable batteries in the end lose their capacity to hold a charge. Nook’s battery is user-replaceable and comparatively inexpensive. To replace Kindle’s battery, Amazon wants you to ship your Kindle to Amazon, and they will ship you back a DIFFERENT Kindle than the one you sent (it’s the same model, for example if you send a white Kindle 3, you get a white Kindle 3 back, but you get a “refurbished” one, NOT the precise one you sent them). I don’t like this at all.
However, various people have posted remarks here that have eased my concerns. Someone looked up stats on the Kindle’s battery and did galore simple calculations to show that it ought to last for 3 or more years. Before that happens, I will surely have upgraded to a newer Kindle model by then. Also, somebody found numerous companies that trade Kindle batteries at reasonable cost and have how-to videos that demonstrate how we may replace the battery ourselves. Doing this would void the Kindle’s warranty, but the battery will in all probability not fail until long after the warranty expires.
[update June 2011: The batteries in the Nook Color and Nook Simple Touch are not replaceable, but the battery in the introductory Nook is.]
* ePub
Nook uses the ePub format, a widely used open format. Amazon uses a proprietary ebook format. Many libraries will “lend” ebooks in the ePub format, which works with nook but not kindle. However, a free and reputable program called Calibre allows you to translate ebooks from one format to another – it supports numerous formats, including ePub and Kindle. The only catch is that it doesn’t work with copy-protected ebooks, so you can’t, for example, buy a Kindle book (which is copy protected) and translate it to ePub so you may read it on a Nook.
* Nook’s color LCD touchscreen
The firstborn Nook has a little color LCD screen on the bottom for navigation. This could be a pro or con, depending on your preferences. It makes the Nook hipper and less drab than Kindle. Some people receive pleasure from using the color LCD to view their library or navigate. I did, at first. But after two weeks of use, and comparings with my wife’s Kindle, I found the committed buttons of the Kindle more comfortable and far quicker to use than the Nook’s color touchscreen. I also found the bright light from the color screen distracting when I was attempting to read a book or newspaper (though when not in use, it shuts off after a minute or so to conserve battery).
* expandable capacity
Nook comes with 2GB of internal memory. If you need more capacity, you may insert a microSD card to add up to 16GB more memory. Kindle comes with 4GB of internal memory – twice as much as Nook – but there’s no way to exaggerate that. Kindle doesn’t receive memory cards of any type. If you mainly use your device to read ebooks and newspapers, this shouldn’t be an issue. I have over 100 books on my Kindle, and I’ve used only a tiny fraction of the memory. Once Kindle’s memory fills up, just delete books you don’t need prompt access to; you may always restore them later, in seconds, for free.
A few other notes:
Kindle and Nook have other features, such as an MP3 player and a web browser, but I caution you to have low expected values for these features. The MP3 player on the Kindle is like the first-generation iPod shuffle – you can’t see what song is playing, and you can’t navigate to other songs on your device. I don’t like the browser on either device; e-ink is just not a good engineering science for surfing the web; it’s slower and clunkier than LCD screen technology, so even the browser on an Android phone or iPod touch is more gratifying to use. However, a great deal of commenters have more favorable views of either device’s browser, and you might, too.
* ebook lending
If you have a Nook or a Kindle, you may “lend” an ebook you purchased to an individual else with the same device for up to two weeks. The Nook has always had this feature. The Kindle just got this feature as of December 2010. Most but not all purchased ebooks are lendable, due to publisher restrictions.
* PDF aid
Kindle and Nook both handle PDF files, but in dissimilar ways. When you put a PDF file on your nook, nook converts it into an ebook-like file, then you may adjust the font size, and the text and pagination will adjust just like with any ebook. But you can not see the original PDF file in the native format in which it was created. Kindle 3 and Kindle DX have native aid for PDF files. You may see PDF files just as they would appear on your computer. You may likewise convert PDF files to an ebook-like format, and then Kindle handles them just the way the Nook handles them – text and pagination adjust when you modify the font size. Unfortunately, numerous symbols, equations, and graphics get lost or mangled in the translation – even when observing PDF files in their native format on the Kindle. Moreover, the little screen size of the Kindle 3 and the Nook is not great for PDF files, most of which are designed for a larger page size. You may zoom and pan, but this is cumbersome and tiresome. Thanks to commenters who suggested looking at PDF files in landscape mode on the Kindle (I don’t recognise if you may do this on Nook); this way, you may see the entire top half of the page without panning, and then scroll down to the bottom half. This works a little better.
SUMMARY:
Nook and Kindle each offer their own advantages. We like the nook’s user-replaceable battery, compatibility with ePub format, and in-store experience. But we strongly prefer Kindle 3 because it is performance is zippier, it is higher-contrast screen is more comfortable to read, and it’s littler and lighter so it is more portable and more comfortable to hold in one hand for long reading sessions.
* Nook Color
Everything I wrote when it comes to the Nook in this review applies to the original Nook (which proceeds to be available), not the new Nook Color. To me, the Nook Color is in a dissimilar product category than the Kindle or firstborn Nook. Nook Color has an LCD screen, like an iPad or most computer monitors. That’s a big disfavor for people like me, who get headaches from reading a computer screen for long periods of time. Amazon’s Kindle product page has an informative section on e-ink vs. LCD displays.
But galore people don’t have troubles reading from computer screens, and the Nook Color is getting glowing reviews in the press and by owners. For the money, it offers a lot of functionality such as a good web browser and the capacity to play games and watch movies. But keep in mind: it costs a lot more than the Kindle, it weighs almost twice as much, it doesn’t come in a 3G version, and (unlike the firstborn Nook) the Nook Color doesn’t have a user replaceable battery.
10169 of 10388 persons found the following review helpful.
Worth the money. Not perfect, but very very good for get started to finish novels in good light
By Jeffrey Stanley
The Kindle is my firstborn e-ink reader. I own an iPad, an iPhone, and have owned a Windows-based phone in the past that I employed as an ereader.
My overall impression of the device is good.
The good:
I’d candidly rather read linear (read from page one to the end, one page at a time) fiction from it than a book, because I can’t always get comfortable with a book. Hardcovers are from time to time a bit heavy, and paperbacks don’t always lie open easily. The Kindle is fantastically light and thin. I may hold it in one hand easily. The page turn buttons are conveniently located. Page-turns aren’t instant, but they’re in all likelihood more quickly than turning a physical page in a printed book (there are just a lot more page-turns unless you choose a little font). The contrast is better than other ereaders I’ve seen. There is zero eye strain in good light. My eyesight isn’t the greatest and I like being capable to increase the font size and read without glasses. I love being competent to browse the Kindle store and read samples before resolving to purchase. The “experimental” browser is astoundingly usable, but isn’t great. It is utile for browsing wikipedia and blogs. The greatest drawback to the browser is the awkward pointer navigation, using the 5-way pad. It syncs your furthest read page over the internet so you may pick up where you left off using your iPhone or iPad.
The so-so:
The kindle store could use more categories and sorting options. You can’t sort by “top rated,” and there is no category for “alternate histories,” for example. Finding a very-specific type of fiction relies on keyword searches, which don’t do a outstanding job. The wifi now and then doesn’t connect before it times-out. You seldom need the wifi, but it is annoying if you change a setting, answer “OK” to the prompt to connect, and the thing tells you it failed to connect two seconds later (the precise moment it gives evidence of that it did in the long run connect, then you need to go back to update the setting again). Most settings don’t require a connection, but it is a minor annoyance. Most of your time will be expended reading, and of course your books are stored on the device and a connection is not required. Part of me wishes I’d purchased the 3G model, because the browser is good sufficient that having lifetime free 3G wireless would be worth the extra money. Magazines don’t look very good and are not very easy to navigate. There is minor glare in a good deal of lighting conditions, largely when a lamp is positioned behind the reader’s head.
The bad:
The contrast is reasonable to poor in dim light. It is much requiring little effort to read a printed page in dim light. In good light, contrast is on par with a pulp paperback. In dim light it feels closely like reading from an old Palm Pilot (resolution is better than an old Palm, but contrast is bad in dim light). The screen is little sufficient that the frequency of page turns is finelooking high. Even in good light, the light gray background is less pleasant than the eggshell background of a printed page. You must tell it to sync before you switch it off, if you suppose the feature permitting you to pick up where you left off using other appliances to work correctly. The copy shelter prevents you from using the files on anything other than Kindle software or devices.
Vs iPad:
IPad is a lot better for magazines, reference materials, and illustrated materials. Kindle is worlds better for reading novels. IPad is finelooking heavy, making it more difficult to hold in your hand or carry with you everywhere. Kindle is much more portable and requiring little effort to hold. IPad has galore aweinspiring children’s books and magazines, which take vantage of it is multimedia features. IPad is unreadable in sunlight and glare is bad in bright light. Kindle is as good as a printed page in bright light. Ipad serves as a originative tool, a computing tool, a gaming tool, and a communication tool. Kindle is only a novel machine. I don’t regret buying either one of them. An iPad won’t replace books, but a Kindle can, if the book is text-only.
I highly commend this device at it is new low price if you are a general reader of novels. I love my kindle. Just don’t suppose it to be more than it is. Leave the magazines and such to the tablet computers.
1901 of 1937 persons found the following review helpful.
A hesistant buyer rejoices on his choice
By Mr Goodwrench
I researched the buy of a Kindle for a long time. I couldn’t determine whether or not it was worth buying a consecrated e-reader. Boy am I glad I made this purchase. The downside to Amazon’s online marketing of Kindle 3 is that the clients don’t get to see it in person. It is much better in person. This may sound stupid, but when I got my new Kindle, I thought there was a stuck-on overlay on the screen containing a diagram of the unit’s buttons, etc. I genuinely tried to peel it off. Doh! The e-ink on this unit is THAT good. I didn’t realize that I was staring at the actual display. I also didn’t realize that no power is required until the display changes. (thus the great battery life) I do a lot of reading, but was facing the chance of reading less or buying big type books because of my variable and deteriorating eyesight. The new Kindle has been a godsend. Now, I may determine the size of type I need depending on my level of fatigue amidst other things. The weight and ergonomics are very good. For someone, like me, with neuropathy in his hands, it is exceedingly easy to manage and gratifying to own. To me, it is posing no difficulty to read than print books. The ease of navigation is great as is the speed. The battery life, so far, has been extraordinary. It without apparent effort connected to our home Wi-Fi, which by design does not broadcast an SSID. It downloads books so fast that I almost thought they were not totally received. I did not buy the 3G version because of the price divergence and the fact that there is no coverage where I live. If you are not perpetually traveling, I don’t see the need to spend the extra bucks, but that is a matter of personal choice. For those who have no Wi-Fi at home, do not forget that you may always download the material to your computer and transfer it by way of USB. Just today I was looking at an consultation with Tony Blair on TV. He was talking in regards to his new book, which sounded interesting. I picked up the Kindle and downloaded a free sample before the consultation was over. I have only read the preface so far, but will probably buy the book. Now THAT is a outstanding way to buy a book! I haven’t employed online browsing spacious yet, but find it reasonable for what the device is. This is primarily a book reader, not a laptop or notebook. They are outstanding for what they do, but can’t match the e-ink display, or the light weight. For those of you worrying in regards to the wait for the new Kindle, let me end with, “It is worth the wait” This new Kindle is all regarding the quality of experience. There are a great deal of format selections for electronic reading. If you want the best experience, go with the Kindle.
See all 31688 client reviews…
Christie
Cute! at least you never have to take him for a walk
Elnora
I wish mine could do this…i could try, but i bet he’ll be afraid of the treadmill
Delmer
Good way to exercise indoor!!! lol….cool!
Damon
best way to get the ladies mate, walk the dog…
Vaughn
my english bulldog can do that too
Latasha
WHAT A BEAUTY..Very nice Dog
Jude
Moderate exercise is ok. The biggest danger is hot, humid weather.
Tameka
yeah hence the taking off of the treadmill
Rena
at least it’s getting some good exercise
Lucile
he looks SO happy in this video ^_^
Courtney
i wasnt aware that bulldogs were able to do that kind of exercise i thought it gets them overheated or something like that, thats cute! lovely animal
Eduardo
you shouldnt put the treadmill with its back too close to the wall. If the dog gets tired and stops moving it might get injured.
Peggy
tat’s so cuteeeee.. n convenient as well, hahaha..
Marcy
wow, a dream, u dont have to walk your dog! lol
Frank
This is the first time I see a bulldog who likes to exercise! He’s awsome, and of course, beautiful!
Debra
Darling Archie – I love you just the way your are – fat – wrinkly – velvety – ham hock looking, darling, precious little toot ‘em up.
Lily
Cute! Your doggie WANTS to exercise???!!!! He gets mad if he has to GET OFF? Wow….most bulldogs would cry if you made them GET ON. Ha ha….
How cute.
Marcelo
wat a fat ***!! i luv him!!
Britt
awesome!
Joaquin
good for his health
Korey
Is he protective of his treadmill? He’ s fu##%%^ the brains out on it! Go ARCHIE>:)
Jeannie
Glad he uses the treadmill! Great for those hot days. Archie’s a cute boy!
Alba
Archie has beening doing this since he was 3 months old. He’s always dragged his paw. Archie has never had any problems, in fact i rarely have to cut his nails.
Imogene
Question: My english bulldog drags his front paws a lot and on hard surfaces he swings out his legs to avoid this. He is five months old. It looks as yours might drag his paws also. Is this something to be concerened with?
Nona
aww so cute!!!luv him